DepEd Bayawan City Division
Frequently Asked Questions
Learn more about the establishment, projects, learner-support programs, and development initiatives of the Bayawan City Division.
π Cityhood
Bayawan became a city on December 23, 2000.
π€ Division Opening
The Interim City Division was formally opened on January 25.
π« Initial Schools
The division initially served 50 elementary schools and 11 secondary schools.
π¨βπ« Initial Teachers
There were 383 elementary teachers and 56 secondary teachers.Β
π Historical Background Establishment, early challenges, schools, teachers, and development goals
π 1. When did Bayawan become a city?
Bayawan became a city on December 23, 2000 through Republic Act No. 8983, sponsored by Congressman Herminio G. Teves of the 3rd Congressional District.
π 2. When was the Interim City Division of Bayawan formally opened?
The Interim City Division was formally opened on January 25 under the leadership of the Department of Education.
π 3. What was the initial organizational structure of the Bayawan City Division?
The division initially operated with nine education supervisors designate, including two district supervisors, one head teacher, one LGU-paid principal, and five elementary school principals. Its administrative section was supported by an OIC Administrative Officer, a utility worker, and two contractual workers.
π 4. How many teachers and schools did Bayawan City Division initially have?
During its early establishment, the division had 383 elementary teachers and 56 secondary teachers assigned in 50 elementary schools and 11 secondary schools distributed across 28 barangays.
π 5. What challenges affected the delivery of education services in Bayawan City?
The division faced challenges such as rough terrain, poor road conditions, long distances from schools to the division office, and heavy rains from June to October.
π6. How far is Bayawan City from Dumaguete City?
Bayawan City is approximately *101 kilometers away from Dumaguete City
π7. What geographical factors affected school operations?
Many schools were located in hinterland areas, with distances ranging from *5 to 57 kilometers from the division office*, making supervision and delivery of educational services challenging.
π8. What was one major reason identified for low academic performance among learners?
One major factor was the involvement of some learners in *farm-related activities*, particularly among families dependent on agriculture for livelihood. One major factor was the involvement of some learners in *farm-related activities*, particularly among families dependent on agriculture for livelihood.Β
π9. What percentage of parents in Bayawan City were engaged in farm-related activities?
Around *80 percent of parents* were earning their livelihood from farm-related activities.
π10. What were some factors contributing to low academic performance?
Identified factors included *learner absenteeism, poor teaching strategies, lack of teaching competency, and minimal supervision of teachers*.
π11. What projects helped improve school facilities in Bayawan City Division?
Infrastructure support came through initiatives such as the *Third Elementary Education Project (TEEP)* and the *Secondary Education Development Improvement Project (SEDIP)*, which supported the construction and renovation of classrooms and facilities.
π12. What was the divisionβs target to improve academic performance?
The division aimed to improve performance by strengthening monitoring of attendance, maximizing teaching hours, improving supervision, and achieving a *75 percent Mean Percentage Score (MPS) target*.
π13. How many colleges are located in Bayawan City?
There are two colleges mentioned in the document: *Bayawan College* and *Negros Oriental State University β Bayawan/Sta. Catalina Campus*.
π14. What percentage of secondary graduates pursued college education locally?
Only around *10 percent of secondary graduates* enrolled in the colleges located in Bayawan City, while others pursued studies in Dumaguete City, Iloilo, Cebu, and Manila.
π15. What was the initial academic performance concern of the division?
The division experienced low Mean Percentage Scores (MPS), particularly in *English, Science, and Mathematics*, which became a major challenge.
π16. What was emphasized to address the divisionβs challenges?
The division emphasized stronger monitoring, improved teacher supervision, maximizing instructional time, and strengthening partnerships with stakeholders.
π‘ Project BONG-ADM Building Opportunities to Nurture Growth through Alternative Delivery Mode
π‘ 1. What is Project BONG-ADM?
Project BONG-ADM is the Schools Division of Bayawan's flagship learner-retention initiative designed to prevent school dropouts by providing flexible and responsive learning options through Alternative Delivery Mode (ADM) and School-Initiated interventions (SII)
π‘ 2. Why was Project BONG-ADM created?
The project was created to address the alarming dropout situation in the division.
- 588 learners dropped out in SY 2021β2022.
- 661 learners dropped out in SY 2022β2023.
The project was introduced to ensure that learners facing various challenges would remain in school and continue learning.
π‘ 3. What problem does it address?
Project BONG-ADM addresses learner dropout caused by factors such as:
- Poverty and economic difficulties
- Distance from school
- Family responsibilities
- Health concerns
- Personal and social circumstances that place learners at risk of leaving school
π‘ 4. What makes Project BONG-ADM unique?
Instead of waiting for learners to leave school, the project proactively identifies learners at risk of dropping out and immediately provides flexible interventions tailored to their needs. Schools are empowered to design localized solutions while adhering to ADM principles.
π‘ 5. What role did the Schools Division Superintendent play?
The Schools Division Superintendent is the brainchild, chief advocate, and driving force behind Project BONG-ADM.
- Conceptualized the project.
- Institutionalized it in the Division Education Development Plan 2023β2028.
- Mobilized schools and stakeholders.
- Promoted a culture where no learner should be left behind.
π‘ 6. How was the project implemented?
- Trained school leaders and teachers on ADM principles.
- Established school-initiated interventions.
- Utilized modular, blended, distance, and limited face-to-face learning modalities.
- Engaged parents, communities, and stakeholders.
- Conducted continuous monitoring of learners at risk.
π‘ 7. What were the results?
| School Year | Dropouts |
|---|---|
| 2021β2022 | 588 |
| 2022β2023 | 661 |
| 2023β2024 | 10* |
| 2024β2025 | 0 |
π‘ 8. Who benefited from the project?
The direct beneficiaries were:
- 885 learners at risk of dropping out in SY 2023β2024.
- 1,453 learners at risk of dropping out in SY 2024β2025.
Thousands of families, teachers, and communities likewise benefited from improved learner retention.
π‘ 9. What broader impact did the project create?
- Institutionalization of the City Feeding Program through a local ordinance.
- Establishment of ADM Rural Farm Schools.
- Increased stakeholder participation in learner support.
- Recognition of SDO Bayawan as a benchmarking destination for best practices in learner retention.
π‘ 10. What makes Project BONG-ADM a transformative and high-impact educational initiative?
With pure intentions of uplifting the living conditions of the community at the grassroots level, the project worked on top of the office's Key Result Areas (KRAs). More than an educational initiative, it became a movement that united the Bayawan City Government, through the Bayawanong Himsog Program, stakeholders, and communities in a shared mission for learner success. Its true impact lies in the ripple effect it createdβinspiring others to act, contribute, and take ownership of education. Project BONG-ADM went beyond delivering results; it awakened a culture of collective responsibility, proving that when a community moves as one, transformation becomes sustainable.
KEY MESSAGE TO REMEMBER
βNo Learner Should be Left Behind.β
π½οΈ Project Bayawanong Himsog Nourishing Learners, Building Opportunities, and Nurturing Growth through School-Based Feeding
π½οΈ 1. What is Project Bayawanong Himsog?
Project Bayawanong Himsog is the City Government of Bayawan's institutionalized school-based feeding program that provides nutritious hot meals and snacks to learners to address short-term hunger, improve school participation, and support learner success.
π½οΈ 2. Why was the project established?
The project was established to ensure that no learner studies on an empty stomach. It responds to the constitutional mandate on child welfare and nutrition and is institutionalized through City Ordinance No. 16.
π½οΈ 3. What problem does the project address?
The project addresses short-term hunger, poor nutrition, low school participation, and learner welfare concerns that may affect attendance, retention, and academic performance.
π½οΈ 4. Who implements the project?
The project is implemented through the partnership of the City Government of Bayawan, DepEd Bayawan City Division, schools, parents, PTCA representatives, and community stakeholders.
π½οΈ 5. How many learners benefit from the project?
A total of 36,245 learners benefit from the program annually.
π½οΈ 6. How is the feeding conducted?
Feeding is conducted three times a week for 54 feeding days per year using an approved monthly meal plan with a budget allocation of β±15.00 per learner.
π½οΈ 7. What is the annual budget allocation?
The City Government allocated β±4 million in CY 2024 and β±4 million in CY 2025 to sustain the program.
π½οΈ 8. How are parents involved?
Parents actively participate in procurement, meal preparation, and food distribution. PTCA representatives also co-sign the feeding plans, ensuring transparency and accountability.
π½οΈ 9. How does the community support the project?
Local farmers contribute rice through the Lukap Program of the City Agriculture Office, demonstrating strong community ownership and partnership.
π½οΈ 10. What role does the LGU play?
The LGU provides policy support, funding, monitoring, coordination, and implementation assistance to ensure uninterrupted delivery of feeding services.
π½οΈ 11. What makes the project sustainable?
Its sustainability is anchored on local legislation, annual budget allocation, strong LGU commitment, active parent participation, and community partnerships.
π½οΈ 12. What is the greatest achievement of Bayawanong Himsog?
Its greatest achievement is transforming feeding from a welfare activity into a community-wide investment that improves learner participation, retention, completion, and success. Investing in learner welfare is investing in educational success, and sustainable outcomes are achieved when government, schools, parents, and communities work as one.
KEY MESSAGE:
βNo learner can learn effectively on an empty stomach.β
π Project EUPHORIA Joyful learning, learner engagement, creativity, and talent development
π 1. What is Project Euphoria?
Project EUPHORIA is a division-wide Mental Health and Psychosocial Support Services (MHPSS) framework that promotes the mental health, psychosocial well-being, and resilience of learners and personnel in the Schools Division of Bayawan City, aligned with RA 11036 (Mental Health Act).
π 2. Why is the project important?
It was implemented to address rising psychosocial challenges such as emotional distress, burnout, disengagement, bullying, and vulnerability among learners and personnel, especially in the post-pandemic educational context.
π3. What is the main goal of Project EUPHORIA?
To institutionalize a comprehensive, sustainable, and rights-based MHPSS system that ensures safe, supportive, and mentally healthy learning environments for all.
π 4. What specific mental health issues does the project address?
It addresses bullying, suicide attempts, emotional distress, behavioral challenges, and psychosocial vulnerabilities affecting learners and school personnel.
π5. How many schools implement the project?
A total of 85 schools implement key components of Project EUPHORIA, including functional support structures and interventions.
π 6. What support systems were established in schools?
All implementing schools established stress management rooms/areas and lactating and childcare rooms to support emotional regulation, privacy, and well-being.
π 7.Β What is the impact on bullying cases?
Bullying cases significantly decreased from 1,805 (SY 2022β2023) to 475 (SY 2023β2024), reflecting a 74% reduction.
π 8. What is the impact on suicide-related cases?
Attempted suicide cases decreased from 76 (SY 2023β2024) to 12 (SY 2024β2025), reflecting an 84% reduction. Claimed suicide deaths were recorded as 4 in SY 2024β2025, underscoring the urgency and continuing need for intervention.
π 9. How does the project support parenting learners?
The number of parenting learners increased and was supported through structured school-based interventions, from 5 cases in SY 2022β2023 to 42 in regular classes and 218 ADM learners in SY 2025β2026.
π 10. What model is used in implementing the project?
The project uses a Triangulation Approach Model that integrates psychosocial interventions, school-based support systems, and stakeholder collaboration for holistic intervention.
π 11. What evidence shows improved school safety and well-being?
The establishment of functional mental health support spaces, reduced bullying incidents, declining suicide attempts, and zero drop-out outcomes demonstrate improved psychosocial safety and resilience.
π 12. What makes Project EUPHORIA sustainable?
Its sustainability is anchored on policy integration, continuous capacity-building, institutional partnerships, and the adoption of the Standard MHPSS Manual under the School Mental Health Program and LRP.
KEY MESSAGE:
βProject EUPHORIA transforms schools into healing, protective, and empowering spaces where every learner is supported, every voice is heard, and every life is valued.β
π Teaching at The Right Level (TaRL) Targeted instruction for foundational literacy and numeracy
π 1. What is Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL)?
TaRL is a structured instructional approach that groups learners based on actual learning levels rather than grade level, using rapid diagnostics, targeted instruction, and level-appropriate learning activities to strengthen foundational literacy and numeracy (FLN).
π 2. What problem does TaRL address?
It addresses persistent learning gaps where learners are promoted to higher grades without mastering basic reading and arithmetic competencies, resulting in low foundational numeracy and literacy proficiency.
π 3. What is the main objective of the pilot implementation?
To equip teachers and school leaders in 11 pilot schools to implement TaRL with fidelity, improve mastery of foundational skills, and reduce within-class learning disparities.
π 4. How is TaRL implemented in schools?
Implementation involves diagnostic assessments, learner grouping by proficiency level, targeted instructional delivery (number sense, operations, and FLN skills), and continuous progress monitoring.
π 5. How many schools and participants are involved?
The program is implemented in 11 pilot schools, serving 488 learners and training 75 teachers in structured TaRL delivery and assessment practices.
π 6. What governance and support structure ensures implementation fidelity?
Teachers assess learners, organize groups, prepare level-appropriate activities, guide practice, monitor progress, and adjust instruction based on learner needs.
π 7. What evidence shows impact on dropout rates?
Dropout rates declined in Senior High School from 9.03% (SY 2022β2023) to 1.25% (SY 2024β2025), while Elementary School maintained a zero dropout rate in SY 2024β2025, based on school records.
π 8. What evidence shows improvement in numeracy outcomes?
Endline assessment results show significant gains, including a reduction in Beginner Level learners from 69.40% to 2.20%, and increases in mastery levels such as Subtraction from 1.4% to 43.30%.
π 9. What makes the TaRL model evidence-driven?
It is anchored on pre-test and post-test diagnostics, learner progress tracking sheets, and consolidated monitoring and evaluation reports that demonstrate measurable learning gains.
KEY MESSAGE TO REMEMBER
βTaRL demonstrates that when instruction is aligned with learner readiness, foundational numeracy improves, learning gaps close, and every learner gains a fair chance to succeed.β
π¬ Special Program in Science (SPS) Developing scientific reasoning and independent research capabilities
π¬ 1. What is the Special Program in Science or SPS?
The SPS is an enriched and accelerated science curriculum implemented in accordance with DepEd Orders No. 55, s. 2010 and No. 31, s. 2012, designed to develop inquiry-driven learners through hands-on experiments, STEM integration, and research-based learning.
π¬ 2. What is the main objective of SPS in Bayawan City Division?
To institutionalize SPS in 14 elementary and 11 secondary schools to produce scientifically competent learners equipped with 21st-century skills in inquiry, innovation, and problem-solving.
π¬ 3. What curricular enhancement is applied in SPS?
The program adds 25% additional science instructional time and integrates modules on environmental science, biotechnology, disaster resilience, and localized contexts such as volcanic monitoring and sustainable agriculture in Negros Oriental.
π¬ 4. How is SPS implemented in schools?
Implementation includes needs assessment, teacher training, learner selection through examination and interview, delivery of science-enriched and problem-based lessons, conduct of investigatory projects, and provision of laboratory support and division-level monitoring.
π¬ 5. How many schools participate in SPS?
Participation increased from 3 schools (SY 2022β2023) to 25 schools (SY 2023β2024 to SY 2025β2026), reflecting sustained expansion and institutionalization.
π¬ 6. How many learners are served under SPS?
The program serves a growing learner population: 339 elementary and 325 secondary (SY 2023β2024), increasing to 1,043 elementary and 992 secondary learners in SY 2025β2026, with 100% accommodation of qualified learners.
π¬ 7. What evidence shows learner output in SPS?
Science Investigatory Projects (SIPs) increased from 10 (SY 2023β2024) to 22 (SY 2024β2025) and 32 (SY 2025β2026), indicating strengthened research productivity and inquiry-based learning.
π¬ 8. What is the level of participation in science competitions?
The program records 100% participation of SPS learners in division, regional, and national science competitions based on official competition records.
π¬ 9. How are teachers prepared for SPS implementation?
A total of 85 science teachers were trained in Science Investigatory Project development and science intervention material construction to ensure instructional quality and research mentoring capacity.
π¬ 10. What instructional strategies define SPS delivery?
The program uses problem-based learning, inquiry-based instruction, laboratory experimentation, and contextualized science modules aligned with local environmental and community realities.
π¬ 11. What evidence indicates improved science readiness?
Monitoring reports, NAT/NCAE-like assessments, and school performance data indicate improved science and mathematics competencies, increased engagement in inquiry, and higher readiness for STEM pathways.
π¬ 12. What makes SPS a sustainable program?
Sustainability is anchored on institutionalized program expansion, continuous teacher capacity-building, provision of laboratory resources, division-level monitoring, and integration of SPS into school improvement planning systems.
KEY MESSAGE:
βThe Special Program in Science transforms learners into critical thinkers and innovators by grounding science education in inquiry, relevance, and real-world application, preparing them for STEM-driven futures.β
πΎ Farm Schools Program (Based on RA 10618) Agriculture-based education, rural productivity, and alternative delivery mode
πΎ 1. What is the Farm Schools Program?
The Farm Schools Program is an alternative learning initiative anchored on Republic Act 10618 (Rural Farm Schools Act), designed to integrate agricultural education, livelihood training, and supervised agricultural experiences to promote rural development and learner empowerment.
πΎ 2. What is the legal basis of the program?
It is grounded on RA 10618, which mandates the State to provide accessible education opportunities that promote agricultural productivity and human capital development in rural communities.
πΎ 3. What is the main objective of the program?
To equip learners with agricultural competencies, livelihood skills, and financial literacy while strengthening their readiness for employment, entrepreneurship, and sustainable farming practices.
πΎ 4. How is the program implemented?
Implementation includes needs analysis, curriculum and learning resource development, stakeholder engagement, supervised farm-based learning activities, and continuous monitoring and benchmarking.
πΎ 5. How many farm school implementers are involved?
The number of implementers expanded from 0 (SY 2021β2023) to 3 (SY 2023β2024), and further increased to 4 implementers from SY 2024β2026, indicating progressive institutionalization.
πΎ 6. How many learners are enrolled in the program?
Learner enrollment increased steadily from 145 (SY 2023β2024) to 246 (SY 2024β2025) and 337 (SY 2025β2026), reflecting growing participation and acceptance.
πΎ 7. What specializations are offered under the program?
The program expanded from no formal specialization offerings to 7 agricultural specializations in SY 2025β2026, strengthening technical-vocational pathways.
πΎ 8. How does the program support financial literacy?
Learners are provided bank passbooks and engaged in supervised income-generating activities, promoting savings behavior and real-world financial management skills.
πΎ 9. How many learners have bank passbooks?
The number increased from 50 (SY 2023β2024) to 169 (SY 2024β2025) and 260 (SY 2025β2026), indicating expanded financial inclusion and tracking of learner earnings.
πΎ 10. What instructional materials support implementation?
All learners are provided with Learning Activity Sheets across learning areas, ensuring consistent access to structured and contextualized learning resources.
πΎ 11. What are the key outcomes of the program?
The program enhances agricultural competencies, ADM implementation, livelihood readiness, financial literacy, and increases the number of youth engaged in sustainable farming and agribusiness.
πΎ 12. What ensures sustainability of the program?
Sustainability is anchored on MOAs, curriculum integration, stakeholder partnerships, financial systems (passbooks and records), benchmarking, and continuous program evaluation.Sustainability is anchored on MOAs, curriculum integration, stakeholder partnerships, financial systems (passbooks and records), benchmarking, and continuous program evaluation.
KEY MESSAGE TO REMEMBER
The Farm Schools Program transforms education into livelihood empowered by developing agriculturally skilled, financially literate, and future-ready learners anchored on rural development and sustainability.β
π BAYAW-BAYAWAN 2023-2028 PROGRAM Program framework, and division goals
PROGRAM FRAMEWORK
The diagram below presents the Bayaw-Bayawan 2028 program structure, including the organizational result, drive, client outcome, PAPS services, division goals, and key results areas.
PAPS Services
Programs, Projects, and Activities
π 1. Project Survive 2.0
aims to increase the following indicators: cohort survival rate; completion rate; net enrolment rate and decrease the following indicators: drop-out rate and failure rate.
π 2. Project Lifeline 2.0
aims to provide learning services to the last, the least and the lost out of school youth and adults, and equip ALS with complete basic education to improve their lives and become productive contributors in the society.
π 3. Project Farm School 1.0
aims to provide access to a broad range of education opportunities and promote agricultural productivity and rural development. It also aims to establish farm schools in secondary schools offering organic agriculture, crop production and animal production.
π 4. Project School for the Arts 1.0
aims intensify talents and skills of learners with inclination for arts and skills (Dance, visual arts, song, sports, journalism).
π 5. Project BONG-ADM (Building Opportunities to Nurture Growth through Alternative Delivery Mode) 1.0
aims to assists schools in the implementation of appropriate ADM to achieve zero drop-out rate.
π 6. Project EIS (Establishment of Integrated Schools) 1.0Β
aims to provide accessible basic education to all and promote inclusivity, and foster social cohesion and citizenship.
π 7. Project SPS (Special Program in Science) 1.0Β
aims to develop studentsβ scientific reasoning and independent research capabilities through interdisciplinary approach.
π 8. Project GREEN (Greening and Refurbishing the Environment with Edibles in a Nature-friendly Schools) Schools 1.0Β
an innovation that unites various programs like GPP, GPAK RRDSC, DRRM, SIGA, and YES-O. It also aims to beautify schools by growing edibles, ornamentals, fruit/ forest trees, like the aims to transform schools into a productive, pollution-free, sustained agro-diversity and nature-friendly environment.
π 9. Project CI (Continuous Improvement) 1.0
intends to improve the quality of education services and enhance productivity of its personnel in their respective key result areas.
π 10. Project LUMAD 2.0 β (Lumad Ugmaron aron Makab-ot Ang Damgo)Β
aims to strengthen the culture- based, culture-sensitive, culture responsive inclusive education of the indigenous cultural communities through institutionalization of the IPEd Program.
π 11. Project Human Resource Capital Development 2.0
aims to provide professional development programs for continuous upskilling and reskilling of personnel for better learning outcomes.
π 12. Project TOTAL 2.0 (Transfer of Teacher, Augmenting Learning) 2.0
aims to standardize the processes involved in the transfer of teachers from one station to another.
π 13. Project Level-up 2.0
aims to attain HR maturity level III accreditation of Civil Service Commission PRIME-HRM.
π 14. Project GAD-CP (Gender and Development- Child Protection) 1.0Β
aims to strengthen advocacy on Magna Carta of Women (RA 9710) and ensure that all schools are conducive to learning.
π 15. Project Inquire 2.0
aims to institutionalize the implementation of action/ basic research for evidence-based policies and program development.
π 16. Project READ (Revving-up, Enjoy And Discover)
designed to address problems on non-readers and non-numerates among primary school children.
π 17. Project 4As (Assess, Assist, Award, and Accredit) 2.0
aims to elevate the level of practice of School Based-Management (SBM) in schools.
π 18. Project LRMS 1.0 (Levelling-up the utilization of learning Resources through Mobilization and Support for all students and learners)
aims to increase distribution and access to quality learning and teaching resource materials for students and teachers for instructional support.
π 19. Project Bayawan Press 2.0
aims to enhance journalistic competencies through active participation in Division, Reginal and National Schools Press Conferences or other journalism related activities.
π 20. Project Fiestalidad 1.0
aims to develop local talents and skills through performance based-learning festivals.
π 21. Project Know 2.0
aims to provide information on the achievement level of learners to serve as guide in addressing prevalent issues and challenges in the conduct of curriculum implementation; aims to implement appropriate interventions/ programs/ projects to achieve the target of increasing achievement rate.
π 22. Project MEAC 2.0 (Mobile Education Assessment Center)Β
aims to upgrade the skills and competencies of SHS TVL learners and teachers.
π 23. Project Sell/ Earn 2.0
aims to establish a market hub/ pasalubong center in the designated area in the Division Office where products and services of learners from schools and CLCs can be promoted.
π 24. Project DRRM 2.0
promote disaster preparedness and resilient school personnel and learners to prepare and mitigate measures to natural calamities.
π 25. Project Health 2.0Β
aims to promote positive and holistic environment for healthy learners and personnel.
π 26. Project Water Break 1.0
prevent the risk of some chronic diseases such as type 2 diabetes, heart diseases and dental cavities.
π 27. Project Whistle 1.0
assist teachers in imposing learnersβ discipline through classroom management strategies.
π 28. Project Bayawanong Himsog/ JACKRAY 1.0
aims to improve the nutritional status of the target beneficiaries.
π 29. Project VOICE 1.0 β (Values Orientation In Classroom Education)
this project embraces and promote values as foundation in the formative years of learnersβ education.
π 30. Project FinQua- (Financial Quality) 1.0
aims to provide quality, on-time and compliant financial services.
π 31. Project Legal 2.0
aims to educate teachers, learners and parents with laws affecting the rights and obligations of learners and teachers; aims to secure school sites by knowing its exact boundaries in preparation for titling in favor of the government.
π 32. Project E-governance 2.0
aims to utilize information and communications technology to support both schools division office and schools for efficient delivery of services.
π 33. Project Bayawan Sports 2.0
aims to provide learners equal opportunity to learn, play and enjoy a variety of team and individual sports.
π 34. Project Bayawan Youth Lead 2.0
to develop learners holistically and enable themΒ to use their talents and skills in building the nation.
π 35. Project DBCDCC 2.0- (DepEd Bayawan City Division Credit Cooperative)Β
aims to help in uplifting the life of all DepEd personnel by becoming the primary credit and lending institution of choice by the employees.
π 36. Project Radyo GUGMA 2.0 (Garantisadong Ugma sa Maalamong Ako)
aims to inform the pub;ic of the latest issues and concerns of the Schools Division of Bayawan City, as well as strengthen quality education through radio-based instruction.
π 37. Project CARES 2.0 (Children are Exceptionally Special)Β
aims to intensify learning services for Learners with Special Education Needs (LSENs).
π 38. Project A1 1.0
aims to establish AI section in kindergarten.


